We are able to have efficient crypto regulation with out stifling innovation. This is how

The one fixed concerning the crypto markets over the previous few weeks is the pace at which issues appear to be getting worse.

Even essentially the most seasoned observers had been shocked as Bitcoin lost more than half its value in the space of a few months and the whole market cap for cryptocurrencies dropped below the $1 trillion mark after it reached $3 trillion in November.

It’s a series of occasions that began with the in a single day collapse of algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD and its companion token Luna. The contagion results took down Three Arrows Capital, Celsius, and Voyager.

Now, critics are doubling down on their declare that crypto markets are nothing however a “wild west” of expensive hypothesis. The crypto trade and conventional finance await extra–and probably way more aggressive–authorities regulation.

Solely time will inform what that regulation will appear to be and whether or not it will likely be efficient. At present, one factor is evident: The applying of conventional regulatory frameworks received’t minimize it.

Cryptocurrency is a singular asset class based mostly on a singular know-how. For crypto regulation to actually make a distinction, it might want to shield traders with out stifling monetary innovation.

My expertise as a regulator for the Treasury, an architect of one of many first crypto compliance features, and the co-founder of a regtech company has led me to conclude {that a} sturdy and complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrency can solely be achieved by way of the prioritization of some key aims.

Clear, workable definitions

The SEC has made clear its want to control and oversee cryptocurrencies. The recent, near doubling in size of its Cyber Unit (now renamed the “Crypto Property and Cyber Unit”) reveals that it’s able to dedicate additional sources and personnel to bringing crypto absolutely beneath its regulatory umbrella. However whereas rising personnel will inevitably lengthen the SEC’s enforcement capabilities, crypto platforms are nonetheless ready for solutions to the query of precisely how cryptocurrencies are to be categorized, in addition to how regulatory authority shall be cut up or shared between the SEC and the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC).

It is going to be as much as Congress to step in and kind out these questions. Nevertheless, decisive laws within the close to time period doesn’t appear notably probably, contemplating that lawmakers only recently began prioritizing crypto hearings.

When lawmakers introduced in Crypto CEOs for a gathering final December, a key presentation was a “level-setting” rationalization of the blockchain and the fundamentals of web3 by former appearing Comptroller of the Foreign money, Brian Brooks (notably the primary company head with a background in crypto). This was an excellent first step, however lawmaker training shall be key in closing the data hole to create efficient regulation.

To this point, potential regulators have outlined crypto by evaluating it to the closest approximation from the world of conventional finance. This “if-it-looks-like-a-duck” strategy has resulted in definitions based mostly on what cryptocurrency has in frequent with conventional finance, relatively than what units it aside.

Crypto regulators might want to create new definitions–ones that talk on to the know-how and processes distinctive to crypto. This, in flip, will permit regulators to create a regulatory framework specifically tailor-made to the property it seeks to supervise.

A few of these definitions have been written into the recent Gillibrand-Lummis bill. Ought to the invoice cross, these definitions would turn into the literal “letter of the legislation.” However it stays to be seen whether or not the language and data offered could be ample for the businesses tasked with creating and implementing laws.

Develop laws which are sturdy but versatile

It’s an outdated truism that innovation doesn’t occur in a boardroom. Technological innovation typically requires an impartial streak that doesn’t play good with the established order.

The issue, in fact, is when that impartial streak runs afoul of conventional authorized safeguards. However regulation and innovation can work collectively if we keep versatile and centered on the finish shopper. Insofar as a crypto token suits an current regulatory framework, the regulation ought to apply.

Nevertheless, if a token suits in a number of regulatory frameworks relying on how it’s used, particular person use circumstances shouldn’t mechanically lengthen the regulatory scope past its purview. litmus check for regulators is to ask the query: Is that this rule defending the tip shopper? Or am I defending current companies on the expense of recent product innovation that might enhance shopper outcomes or promote competitors?

Regulators can’t be anticipated to see the long run greater than anybody else. However by being aware–not simply of the bounds which are being set, however of the house left for merchandise and processes to develop–they’ll write sturdy, complete laws whereas nonetheless permitting finance and know-how to proceed to evolve.

Implement laws on the pace of know-how–and let the know-how allow you to

Future conversations about 2022’s crypto market crash will inevitably give attention to how briskly issues went unsuitable. It is going to be entrance of thoughts for lawmakers and regulatory businesses as they develop new insurance policies particularly designed to guard customers and counter excessive market volatility.

As these new legal guidelines solidify, it will likely be essential that these teams think about an typically ignored coverage goal: the event of an enforcement framework that can permit regulators to maneuver as quick because the crypto market itself.

Pace isn’t historically a regulator’s sturdy go well with–and deliberately so. Regulators are, by nature, considerate, prudent, and measured. However in distinction to the opacity of the standard finance trade, crypto-specific laws have the potential to reap the benefits of crypto’s personal native traits, corresponding to its digital-first format and inherent transparency.

This not solely implies that blockchain-enabled tools may be put to make use of serving to implement laws, however future laws may even stand to realize from the technological developments which have sprung up as a part of the bigger crypto ecosystem. 

This, just like the work of setting clear definitions and writing versatile coverage, would require work on the a part of each lawmakers and regulatory businesses. However the reward for doing so could also be a regulatory enforcement framework that paves the way in which not only for crypto regulation, however for the following technology of conventional monetary market regulation as properly.

A path ahead

The silver lining to intervals of disaster and issue is that they typically spur motion from these with the facility to enact lasting change.

Nevertheless, there may be all the time a hazard that the will to “repair what’s damaged” will result in decision-making that’s overly conservative and shortsighted, stifling progress in the long run.

Crypto regulation is required–and the time to jot down and implement it has clearly arrived. Policymakers would do properly to keep in mind that to disregard what makes cryptocurrencies distinctive and beneficial is simply as silly as by no means regulating them in any respect.

Matt Van Buskirk is the co-founder and CEO of Hummingbird Regtech.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t replicate the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Extra must-read commentary printed by Fortune: